A few weeks ago I finished Walter Isaacson’s biography of Steve Jobs. Overall, I thought it was a well-written and honest account of the man and his life. There was plenty in the book that Steve Jobs would not like to read but to sugar coat or gloss-over the way Jobs was would be disingenuous. It would create a false representation of what it was about his personality that enabled him to take Apple from his parents’ California garage and turn it into one of the most valuable companies on the planet. In all honesty, he was often a real ass and would cut down people mercilessly, but the abuse often led to better results, better products, and people working together to do things they thought they could not do. It wasn’t always necessary to be so mean but that’s just the way he was. In the end, however, the good and bad aspects of his personality and management style were focused on one main goal: to create a company that would thrive and innovate a generation or two after he was gone. Isaacson quotes a long passage from Jobs near the end of the book, in the chapter called Legacy.
I hate it when people call themselves ‘entrepreneurs’ when what they’re really trying to do is launch a startup and then sell or go public, so they can cash in and move on. They’re unwilling to do the work it takes to build a real company, which is the hardest work in business. That’s how you really make a contribution and add to the legacy of those who went before. You build a company that will stand for something a generation or two from now. That’s what Walt Disney did, and Hewlett and Packard, and the people who built Intel. They created a company to last, not just to make money.”
It became apparent to me that his point about creating value and creating a company for the ages is akin to the larger sustainability movement, and about how we have to create a society for the ages.
With the advances in IT and other technologies, we are truly one world now. With some imagination, you can think of global society as a 7 billion person company with each country a division – led by a president or a “CEO” – a part of the whole. You can stretch the metaphor further but indulge me on this overall proposition for a moment. All of us are workers in that company. We get hired and are fired and live a life of demotions and promotions as we figure out what it is we are actually doing and/or supposed to be doing while we are here on earth. Some of us excel more than others. Some of us change jobs or switch divisions but we all remain in the same company. The contributions that we make are often lost within the sheer size of the enterprise, but they have – even in their smallest degrees – an effect on the business of human society. Collectively, we try to make the world function better. We create time saving inventions and disease eradicating vaccines. We try new forms of government and refine the ones we already have. We try to push the human race forward; to improve, to progress. Sometimes we don’t do so well. We fight wars and act out all forms of destructive behavior. Rogue employees try to overthrow the board, sometimes succeeding. Bad leaders have pushed the world near bankruptcy (sticking with the metaphor of global society as a company) both literally and figuratively numerous times; right to the edge. But so far, the human enterprise has come roaring back. A bad leader or system is thrown out when the “stockholders” revolt.
Global society adapts to changing conditions in order to sustain itself; in order to survive. But for it to truly live on, it must become sustainable. The human experiment must not just be about hedonism or wealth, mastery over nature or disregard for all that has come before us or, indeed, disregard for all that will come after. Nor should we disregard or abuse all the plentiful resources around us which we use to live, prosper, and invent. Rather, it’s about creating something that will last for generations after we are gone. It’s not easy. It means we have to stop living how we’ve been living. It means
As a follow up to the 2-part series from NPR (covered here recently on 2nd Green Revolution) comes this post about various countries’ climate policy. With the end of the United Nations’ most recent conference on climate change in Durban, South Africa, NPR had a valuable synopsis of what many of the largest emitters of greenhouses are doing to reduce their emissions over the coming decades.
