Currently, there are several options available to consumers that are more efficient than traditional incandescent bulbs. Among those that have been on the market are the squiggly compact florescent light bulb (CFL) and light emitting diodes (LEDs). While these bulbs have achieved great reduction in energy, one major argument against their use is the seemingly unnatural light they produce. In addition, CFLs use toxic metals such as mercury in their manufacture.
Announced last year, the L-Prize has its first entrant. Royal Philips Electronics of the Netherlands, a “diversified Health and Well-being company, focused on improving people’s lives through timely innovations,” submitted the first bulb for testing. A press release from the company states that they “manufactured and will bring to market an LED replacement for the common 60-Watt incandescent light bulb. Philips developed this product in response to DOE’s industry-wide challenge, and was . . . recognized by DOE as the first company to submit an entry.”
The New York Times reported last week that “Testing of the Philips lamp will take close to a year to complete as the department independently evaluates the company’s claims.” During this time more entrants are expected to submit their updated version of the light bulb.
- Eric Wilson
[image source: Philips]
Posted in
Tags: 
